Tierless Programming for SDNs: Optimality
Tags: Flowlog, Programming Languages, Software-Defined Networking, VerificationPosted on 13 April 2015.
This post is part of our series about tierless network programming with Flowlog:
Part 1: Tierless Programming
Part 2: Interfacing with External Events
Part 3: Optimality
Part 4: Verification
Part 5: Differential Analysis
Since packets can trigger controller-state updates and event output, you might wonder exactly which packets a Flowlog controller needs to see. For instance, a packet without a source in the watchlist will never alter the controller's state. Does such a packet need to grace the controller at all? The answer is no. In fact, there are only three conditions under which switch rules do not suffice, and the controller must be involved in packet-handling:
- when the packet will cause a change in controller state;
- when the packet will cause the controller to send an event; and
- when the packet must be modified in ways that OpenFlow 1.0 does not support on switches.
Flowlog's compiler ensures the controller sees packets if and only if one of these holds; the compiler is therefore optimal with respect to this list. To achieve this, the compiler analyzes every packet-triggered statement in the program. For instance, the INSERT statement above will only change the state for packets with a source in the watchlist (a condition made explicit in the WHERE clause) and without a source in the seen table (implicit in Flowlog's logical semantics for INSERT). Only if both of these conditions are met will the controller see a packet. An optimal compiler prevents certain kinds of bugs from occurring: the controller program will never miss packets that will affect its state, and it will never receive packets it doesn't need.
You can read more about Flowlog in our paper.
In the next post, we'll look at Flowlog's built-in verification support.